- #Appzapper mac 10.5 8 mac os x
- #Appzapper mac 10.5 8 mac os
- #Appzapper mac 10.5 8 update
- #Appzapper mac 10.5 8 upgrade
- #Appzapper mac 10.5 8 full
However, I know that Apple was never big on customization.
You know, move the window control buttons to the right, get maximize button to actually maximize the window, etc. That would allow me to make it more PC-like (maybe I should say Windows like). You pretty much said everything about Mac Pro that I can think of.Īs for OS X, I am not a Mac user, so what I would like for it is to be more customizable.
#Appzapper mac 10.5 8 full
I want it to handle full surround and I want the ipods/iphones to have hardware support. I want it in my stereo, my surround equipment, in my speakers. Open Air Tunes so all hardware vendors can use it. Introduce proper surround sound in the core OS as well as all other products.Īnd if I can get a little extra hardware wish. Better use of meta-data in the filesystem (iTunes, I am looking at you! XML database? I am crying inside! And changing something in the filesystem freaking breaks iTunes. OS X: Resolution independence (we have waited long enough). Other than that give us a Mac, which is the Pro but with a Desktop CPU instead (iNTEL i7 or what they are called today), smaller case, normal RAM, and the option of faster GFX cards. Redo the case, it’s by far and large the ugliest mac around today. I want my experience coherent and I want them to put their development money and time into giving me features which I find useful, and I want them to shy from complexity and embrace elegance through simplicity. I often change very little on any OS I use and if you have bad defaults, then it is bad for me. I want Apple to come up with the absolute best defaults that they can, and I will only change what I really really need to change. Other kinds of geeks, like me, are far better served by a system like OS X. I know many people, chiefly certain kinds of geeks, crave the “I want to change everything”-approach and I think the honestly are better served by Linux.
It would add a complexity to the OS in many ways. A highly customizable OS is counter to what Apple wants to achieve with OS X, and adding it would seriously break their OS to the point where it isn’t a Mac system at all anymore. They brought back certain values and ideas and the old MacOS simply wasn’t compatible with that.
#Appzapper mac 10.5 8 mac os
One thing I can’t understand is why did they introduce Appearance Manager in Mac OS 8, only to drop it with Mac OS X?īecause Jobs came back, with his team as well.
#Appzapper mac 10.5 8 update
I’d also like a decent way to update applications across the board, a ban on packages with installers, and App Zapper built-in. What would you change? Personally, I’d love to have a better file manager built-in, one that does not suffer from split personality disorder like the Finder currently does.
#Appzapper mac 10.5 8 mac os x
Then there’s Mac OS X itself, which we add into the discussion to make it more interesting for OSNews. In addition, anyone who has ever had to shop for a Mac video card knows the ridiculous price difference between Mac and “normal” PC video cards.
#Appzapper mac 10.5 8 upgrade
The default cards are too slow for such machines, many claim, and there are far too few options to upgrade to, and even those are outdated. There are also a lot of complaints on the video side of things. 8GB sounds like a lot to me, but professionals often need more than that. Currently, it can’t take more than 8GB of RAM, while competitors offer no such limit at all on similar machines. You could vaguely argue that it doesn’t make any sense yet for average desktop machines or laptops, but when it comes to these high-end workstations used by professionals, I don’t think there is a valid excuse for not offering Blu-Ray at least an an option.Īnother pain in the bum, according to many Engadget readers, is the RAM limit on the single processor machine. A lot of people are asking for Blu-Ray, which I think is a valid thing to ask of such a high-end machine.
Still, some other complaints appear to be pretty valid. In any case, I’m not going there – I don’t need a Mac Pro. If you think the price/value ratio is okay, then the Mac Pro certainly isn’t expensive. The Mac Pro isn’t “cheap”, but the obvious problem with the word “cheap” is that it’s all relative. Starting with the Mac Pro question, the most common complaint over at Engadget is obviously that of price. And since this is OSNews, we add a question of our own: what would you change about Mac OS X? Engadget readers already had a few things to say – this is the internet after all. Since it’s weekend, which usually equates to no news, we figured we’d follow in Engadget’s footsteps by asking you, our dear and loving readers, what you would change about Apple’s current Mac Pro.
0 kommentar(er)
